FAQ – Solar Cancellation Resource Center “Missouri”

Missouri Homeowners’ Guide to Reviewing Solar Agreements & Consumer Rights

Missouri homeowners are increasingly reporting solar deals that promised significant utility savings—only to find their monthly costs rising due to complex net metering rules with providers like Ameren or Evergy, and aggressive sales tactics.

At Solar Cancellation Resource Center Missouri, we partner with independent consumer protection attorneys who can help you explore options for your solar leases, loans, and power purchase agreements (PPAs).

If you feel you were subjected to deceptive sales tactics, misleading savings claims, or underperforming equipment, you may be eligible for a legal review. Many Missouri residents find that their agreements may be reviewed under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) and other state consumer protections.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Review Process

How long does it take for an attorney to review my solar agreement in Missouri?

If your file is accepted for review, the timeline for potential resolution typically ranges from 12–24 months, depending on the solar provider, the lender, and the complexity of the contract. Factors such as Missouri Public Service Commission regulations or specific misrepresentations regarding the Federal Solar Tax Credit can influence the duration of a legal challenge.

If an attorney achieves a resolution, you may be released from the identified financial obligations. This could include the termination of monthly payments, future price escalators, or large balloon payments. Many Missourians pursue this path to address long-term liability and regain control of their household finances.

The status of the equipment depends on the specific negotiated terms between your attorney and the solar provider:

  • In some instances, panels may be removed at no cost to the homeowner.
  • In other cases, the equipment may remain on-site under a modified agreement or as part of a settlement.
  • Independent attorneys negotiate these outcomes based on Missouri contract law, especially if the panels were found to be faulty or misrepresented.

We organize and collect information for every file before it is referred for professional review. We prioritize referring files where an attorney may identify strong grounds for a challenge, such as:

  • Misleading “zero-dollar bill” savings claims.
  • High-pressure door-to-door sales tactics.
  • Failure to disclose the full terms of financing or “Dealer Fees.”
  • Violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA).

Missouri-Specific FAQ Additions

What are my cancellation rights under Missouri law?
  • RSMo Section 407.937: Missouri provides a 3-business-day right to cancel many home solicitation contracts.
  • MMPA: This act allows attorneys to challenge deceptive or unfair practices and seek potential remedies for consumers who were misled.
  • Attorney General Scrutiny: The Missouri AG’s office has increased its focus on the solar industry in 2026, creating a stronger climate for consumer advocacy.
  •  

Common concerns reported during our intake process include:

  • Promised utility savings that didn’t materialize under Evergy or Ameren net metering.
  • High-interest solar loans that outpace the value of the energy produced.
  • Confusion regarding Missouri-specific property tax exemptions for solar.
  • Difficulty selling a home due to the UCC-1 lien on the solar equipment.

Yes. An attorney may determine that a legal review is appropriate post-installation if there is evidence of misrepresentation, breach of contract, or deceptive practices during the sales or financing phase.